Skip to main content

Educating Digital Citizens

This week we looked at the concept of the digital citizen and were asked that in our roles as educators/instructional designers, if we viewed it as our collective responsibility to promote and develop our students as digital citizens and if we did believe that it was our responsibility, how should we go about it. 

I have this some thought and looked t engage my classmates with this and felt that I do believe that it is part of our role as educators to include awareness of proper behaviors to be a good digital citizen in what we do. I think that this responsibility begins at home and that it is primarily the parents who should be distilling the proper character of citizenship IRL or in the digital space. However, I think that this continues on at school and that as educators it is our role to supplement these behaviors and to teach our students how to act professionally, how to communicate clearly, and be respectful in settings with diverse viewpoints. I think we do this in practice with IRL interactions, but that we need to explicitly explain that the behaviors carry over.

Communication in the classroom is something educators push for and include skills of using proper grammar and tone. We work to remind our students that it is important to consider purpose in every form of communication. Our instructions, classrooms, and institutions provide places for them to practice communication with each other and those they answer to (teachers, admin, job applications, etc.) IRL and I think we need make sure that we explain that these are important online too.

Personally, I’ve never been one to think that the third space of digital media needs to be so different that the fundamentals of human connection and respect of others should be different there. The ability to adopt different identities and screen names doesn’t change that.


Comments

  1. LeeJuly 25, 2020 at 8:52 AM

    I really like and agree with your comment that behavior expectations shouldn't change just because digital media is involved. I wonder if this has gone the other way, though; if normalization of bad behavior in digital media has normalized bad behavior in the real world.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 6

In this chapter, Van Dijck focuses on YouTube. YouTube started with the intentions of being an alternative to broadcast television. Like Flickr, its origins and its present state do not function the same. Where it used to focus on user generated content, the user is considered more of a consumer now with the intention of watching rather than posting. However, YouTube introduced some new abilities that have had a lasting impact. YouTube introduced the idea of streamed content, the ability to upload video, and combined these with aspects of social networking! YouTube videos are rarely downloaded, viewers do not own the content, but they have access to view the material. Where YouTube differs from Flickr is that in its adaptions of the purpose and focus, Some of the original users of the platform were disgruntled by the changes, but the majority of users supported the change and embraced it as a part of their everyday lives, particularly with their capabilities of meshing almost seamlessl
Post a Comment
Read more

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 7

This chapter focuses on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is much different from the other sites discussed in the book so far, however its inclusion in the top influential actors in the digital landscape is undeniable.  Wikipedia is a "professionally run, volunteer based, nonprofit organization whose goal is the online production of an encyclopedia" (p. 132). It's nonprofit status came about due to the creation and maintenance of the Wikimedia Foundation. The sites is founded on five basic principles, but she never actually lists those 5 principles, but says that neutrality is the most important of them and while the elements that measure the success of the encyclopedia also cause "disenchantment" for those who feel that the focus on neutrality and the bureaucratic structure limits the site. Van Dijck discuses the users of the site and states that crowd management is one of the sites biggest strengths. She points out that it is neither the specialists or the generalists that
Post a Comment
Read more

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 4

Chapter 5 focuses on Twitter. Originally the creators of Twitter were striving to create a utility. A piece of information infrastructure that was an everyday and unnoticeable part of our lives, like electricity or phones. Van Dijck says that this created a paradox in that is "presumes Twitter to be a neutral platform upon which users freely interact, much like the Web itself...indifferent to the contents they exchange" but that "the streams of data are engineered to promote certain uses and users over time" (p.69). Van Dijck says this paradox of "enabling connectedness while engineering connectivity" and "propagating neutrality while securing profitability" show up in every aspect of the platform. This is kind of a trend in all social media platforms as the start out about the user, but need to pay the bills... The Twitter platform has has some pivotal contributions to the culture of connectivity (culture influence tech while tech influences cul
2 comments
Read more