Skip to main content

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 5


This chapter focuses on Flickr. More specifically it focuses on the struggle and what some would call failure of Flickr. While the platform is still around and has a fairly large number of users, the platform itself is an example of where Web 2.0 tools can flop.

According to Van Dijck:

"Flickr members wanted the owners to invest in user connectedness and were willing to pay for it. On the other hand, Flickr developed a platform for app designers, third parties, and advertisers who regarded the site's mass of generated photographic content as a unique resource waiting to be monetized" (p. 94).

In short the site turned from their community of users, to the commodity of the data they produced. They changed the interface several times, changed their motto, reintroduced stuff they had taken down under new names, and in the end alienated their core users who invested their time and loyalty at the beginning. 

This chapter didn't provide a lot of new insight, but it did warn about the dangers for social media when it does not have a firm vision and mission in place. 

Comments

  1. I feel like if Flickr tried to be more of a Web 2.0 tool and added more social media-like features, it would have to compete with Instagram and that's just not going to happen. Most of the people I know who utilize Flickr are amateur photographers and want to get their photos seen by others through the platform.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Erin,

      Van Dijck points out that Flickr's uncertain and varied attempts to implement those Web 2.0 features rather than focus on that loyal photographer user base is what has kept it from being successful. If they had stayed true to their original mission and developed a user base within that community, it would have been better off.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 6

In this chapter, Van Dijck focuses on YouTube. YouTube started with the intentions of being an alternative to broadcast television. Like Flickr, its origins and its present state do not function the same. Where it used to focus on user generated content, the user is considered more of a consumer now with the intention of watching rather than posting. However, YouTube introduced some new abilities that have had a lasting impact. YouTube introduced the idea of streamed content, the ability to upload video, and combined these with aspects of social networking! YouTube videos are rarely downloaded, viewers do not own the content, but they have access to view the material. Where YouTube differs from Flickr is that in its adaptions of the purpose and focus, Some of the original users of the platform were disgruntled by the changes, but the majority of users supported the change and embraced it as a part of their everyday lives, particularly with their capabilities of meshing almost seamlessl

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 7

This chapter focuses on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is much different from the other sites discussed in the book so far, however its inclusion in the top influential actors in the digital landscape is undeniable.  Wikipedia is a "professionally run, volunteer based, nonprofit organization whose goal is the online production of an encyclopedia" (p. 132). It's nonprofit status came about due to the creation and maintenance of the Wikimedia Foundation. The sites is founded on five basic principles, but she never actually lists those 5 principles, but says that neutrality is the most important of them and while the elements that measure the success of the encyclopedia also cause "disenchantment" for those who feel that the focus on neutrality and the bureaucratic structure limits the site. Van Dijck discuses the users of the site and states that crowd management is one of the sites biggest strengths. She points out that it is neither the specialists or the generalists that

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 4

Chapter 5 focuses on Twitter. Originally the creators of Twitter were striving to create a utility. A piece of information infrastructure that was an everyday and unnoticeable part of our lives, like electricity or phones. Van Dijck says that this created a paradox in that is "presumes Twitter to be a neutral platform upon which users freely interact, much like the Web itself...indifferent to the contents they exchange" but that "the streams of data are engineered to promote certain uses and users over time" (p.69). Van Dijck says this paradox of "enabling connectedness while engineering connectivity" and "propagating neutrality while securing profitability" show up in every aspect of the platform. This is kind of a trend in all social media platforms as the start out about the user, but need to pay the bills... The Twitter platform has has some pivotal contributions to the culture of connectivity (culture influence tech while tech influences cul