Skip to main content

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 5


This chapter focuses on Flickr. More specifically it focuses on the struggle and what some would call failure of Flickr. While the platform is still around and has a fairly large number of users, the platform itself is an example of where Web 2.0 tools can flop.

According to Van Dijck:

"Flickr members wanted the owners to invest in user connectedness and were willing to pay for it. On the other hand, Flickr developed a platform for app designers, third parties, and advertisers who regarded the site's mass of generated photographic content as a unique resource waiting to be monetized" (p. 94).

In short the site turned from their community of users, to the commodity of the data they produced. They changed the interface several times, changed their motto, reintroduced stuff they had taken down under new names, and in the end alienated their core users who invested their time and loyalty at the beginning. 

This chapter didn't provide a lot of new insight, but it did warn about the dangers for social media when it does not have a firm vision and mission in place. 

Comments

  1. I feel like if Flickr tried to be more of a Web 2.0 tool and added more social media-like features, it would have to compete with Instagram and that's just not going to happen. Most of the people I know who utilize Flickr are amateur photographers and want to get their photos seen by others through the platform.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Erin,

      Van Dijck points out that Flickr's uncertain and varied attempts to implement those Web 2.0 features rather than focus on that loyal photographer user base is what has kept it from being successful. If they had stayed true to their original mission and developed a user base within that community, it would have been better off.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 4

Chapter 5 focuses on Twitter. Originally the creators of Twitter were striving to create a utility. A piece of information infrastructure that was an everyday and unnoticeable part of our lives, like electricity or phones. Van Dijck says that this created a paradox in that is "presumes Twitter to be a neutral platform upon which users freely interact, much like the Web itself...indifferent to the contents they exchange" but that "the streams of data are engineered to promote certain uses and users over time" (p.69). Van Dijck says this paradox of "enabling connectedness while engineering connectivity" and "propagating neutrality while securing profitability" show up in every aspect of the platform. This is kind of a trend in all social media platforms as the start out about the user, but need to pay the bills... The Twitter platform has has some pivotal contributions to the culture of connectivity (culture influence tech while tech influences cul...

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 2

In chapter 2, van Dijck gets a little more technical. He presents definitions for various aspects of the social media construction.  Technologies included: data, metadata, algorithm, protocols, interfaces, and defaults He broke down the concepts of users and usage: " Implicit participation is the usage inscribed in the engineer's design by means of the coding mechanisms" (p.33).  " Explicit use refers to how real or actual users interact with social media" (p.33). He discuses content (text, music, or videos) and how these display the opinions of the users, the things they are interested in or want, and other social trends and consumer practices.  He describes ownership of the social media site, governance (mechanisms, communication and data traffic management), and business models and intentions of the site and how these 3 things work with the previous 3 things (content, user agency, and content) to create online sociality. Ultimately the focus of this chapter...

The Big Sleep - Book Suggestion

Reading has always been a bit of an escape for me. As long as I can remember, I've been obsessed with fiction and the ability to get away from my present and go pretty much anywhere. Even as I am pursuing my Phd, I find that I am constantly buying (odd for someone with a Library degree) the next novel that I want to read. I almost always have a novel on me, I think I really picked the habit up when I moved to New York and realized there is so much time to read throughout the day that you might miss. Taking the train, waiting rooms, random periods when you are in between tasks, etc. So since then, I find that I get through more novels that expected, even though I'm in a period of study that requires a lot of reading. I've been on a bit of a noir kick. I love the old movies and I've discovered that some of my favorites are based on novels and that the author has written many more. I've always loved The Big Sleep with Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall and found out tha...