Skip to main content

Where's the BEEF...I mean POLICY!?

One of my interests is to explore the current policy landscape of social media and schools. I'm interested in working on a literature review that identifies the relevant policy actors, describes the formal social media policies at the federal, state, and local level, and the pertinent research and theory that addresses these topics. The hope is to have an annotated bibliography and a paper that I can submit to upcoming conferences. So where to begin? 

I decided to start at the Federal Level. I know that most education policy happenes at the state level, but I figured there had to be something. When you go to the U.S. Department of Education Website it doesn't take long for you to find references to the department and the individuals social media presence, but the difficult part is finding their stance, regulations, and expectations for the use of social media. 

The list of social media links is rather broad:

https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/focus/social-media.html

The only policy social media related that I have been able to find is the following:

"ED is using third-party social media sites to provide ED content in formats that may be useful or interesting; however, ED.gov is the official source of information from the U.S. Department of Education (ED). ED cannot attest to the accuracy of other information provided by these or any other linked sites. Using these third-party sites does not constitute an endorsement by ED or any of its employees of the sponsors of the sites or the information or products presented on the sites. Also, please be aware that the privacy protection provided at ED.gov may not be available on these third-party sites. Please note that when ED uses social media sites, ED does not collect or in any way use personally identifiable information."

https://www2.ed.gov/notices/privacy/index.html#social-media

SO again I ask: Where's the policy?

Comments

  1. Omer ArslanMay 24, 2020 at 2:58 PM

    Sounds like you're headed to a critical journey! Your paper would definitely make a contribution to answering your question. Also, your post reminded me of an article that I've come across once (https://bit.ly/3gtkFJo). Just wanted to share it here! I'm not sure whether it's relevant to your question, though. Keep informing us about policies! Definitely adds layer to my approach..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Erin HajdukMay 24, 2020 at 4:11 PM

    This sounds like a ground-breaking paper that you're working on! I don't know much (or anything really) about government policy but I wonder if there even is any theory behind how these different branches of government use social media? I would assume that they follow the same guidelines as businesses.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 6

In this chapter, Van Dijck focuses on YouTube. YouTube started with the intentions of being an alternative to broadcast television. Like Flickr, its origins and its present state do not function the same. Where it used to focus on user generated content, the user is considered more of a consumer now with the intention of watching rather than posting. However, YouTube introduced some new abilities that have had a lasting impact. YouTube introduced the idea of streamed content, the ability to upload video, and combined these with aspects of social networking! YouTube videos are rarely downloaded, viewers do not own the content, but they have access to view the material. Where YouTube differs from Flickr is that in its adaptions of the purpose and focus, Some of the original users of the platform were disgruntled by the changes, but the majority of users supported the change and embraced it as a part of their everyday lives, particularly with their capabilities of meshing almost seamlessl
Post a Comment
Read more

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 7

This chapter focuses on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is much different from the other sites discussed in the book so far, however its inclusion in the top influential actors in the digital landscape is undeniable.  Wikipedia is a "professionally run, volunteer based, nonprofit organization whose goal is the online production of an encyclopedia" (p. 132). It's nonprofit status came about due to the creation and maintenance of the Wikimedia Foundation. The sites is founded on five basic principles, but she never actually lists those 5 principles, but says that neutrality is the most important of them and while the elements that measure the success of the encyclopedia also cause "disenchantment" for those who feel that the focus on neutrality and the bureaucratic structure limits the site. Van Dijck discuses the users of the site and states that crowd management is one of the sites biggest strengths. She points out that it is neither the specialists or the generalists that
Post a Comment
Read more

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 4

Chapter 5 focuses on Twitter. Originally the creators of Twitter were striving to create a utility. A piece of information infrastructure that was an everyday and unnoticeable part of our lives, like electricity or phones. Van Dijck says that this created a paradox in that is "presumes Twitter to be a neutral platform upon which users freely interact, much like the Web itself...indifferent to the contents they exchange" but that "the streams of data are engineered to promote certain uses and users over time" (p.69). Van Dijck says this paradox of "enabling connectedness while engineering connectivity" and "propagating neutrality while securing profitability" show up in every aspect of the platform. This is kind of a trend in all social media platforms as the start out about the user, but need to pay the bills... The Twitter platform has has some pivotal contributions to the culture of connectivity (culture influence tech while tech influences cul
2 comments
Read more