Skip to main content

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 3



In chapter 3 JVD, tackles Facebook. 

In this chapter he explores the created norm of sharing. He argues that this is an evolving norm, and through the popularity and size of Facebook, this platform is most responsible for this contribution to the culture of connectivity. 

In terms of the technology of sharing there are two aspects. The first is connectedness and the other is connectivity. Connectedness are the traits you are familiar with. All the things that link you to those around you on the website, Connectivity is the sharing of your user data with some third party. 

One particularly interesting topic is Facebooks creation of the Like button. This feature plays into the connectivity of sharing while appearing as an example of the other. On the surface when you hit the like button on goods or products it shows up on your friends feed and therefore seems you are sharing your interest within the site. However, when you click on the Like button there is also a sharing of data between the products site and FB that is recorded and added into the algorithms so that both sites can tailor the experience for the user of what new information is presented. Through this Like button, the norm of third part sharing was acceptable, where other attempts had failed.

 The chapter continues discussing how FB has developed over the years, transitioning from a database of personality to a narrative/timeline style presentation of self/identity. JVD discusses how this is all ties into the user/owner power struggle between connectedness and connectivity. How this dynamic is a "balancing act between stimulating users' activity and exploiting it; its [Facebook] success depends on customers' willingness to contribute data and to allow maximum data mining" (p.64).

Ultimately this chapter describes the powerhouse that is Facebook and how it has had major lasting  contributions to the development of social media and the connected culture that uses it. Even if it should lose its popularity, the effects will be noticeable for quite some time.

Comments

  1. Danielle DavisMay 31, 2020 at 10:02 AM

    I agree with your last statement about FB's empowering community connectivity. I had never thought the addition of the like button as an innovation of connection. I would be curious to know more about how the dynamics of personal narratives and timelines are negotiated by users on other platforms.

    ReplyDelete
  2. LeeJune 3, 2020 at 3:43 PM

    Thanks for this summary. The distinction between connectivity and connectedness is intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stephen BunnJune 8, 2020 at 10:15 AM

    Thanks Danielle and Lee, for checking my blog out! It's always nice to see someone interested!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 6

In this chapter, Van Dijck focuses on YouTube. YouTube started with the intentions of being an alternative to broadcast television. Like Flickr, its origins and its present state do not function the same. Where it used to focus on user generated content, the user is considered more of a consumer now with the intention of watching rather than posting. However, YouTube introduced some new abilities that have had a lasting impact. YouTube introduced the idea of streamed content, the ability to upload video, and combined these with aspects of social networking! YouTube videos are rarely downloaded, viewers do not own the content, but they have access to view the material. Where YouTube differs from Flickr is that in its adaptions of the purpose and focus, Some of the original users of the platform were disgruntled by the changes, but the majority of users supported the change and embraced it as a part of their everyday lives, particularly with their capabilities of meshing almost seamlessl
Post a Comment
Read more

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 7

This chapter focuses on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is much different from the other sites discussed in the book so far, however its inclusion in the top influential actors in the digital landscape is undeniable.  Wikipedia is a "professionally run, volunteer based, nonprofit organization whose goal is the online production of an encyclopedia" (p. 132). It's nonprofit status came about due to the creation and maintenance of the Wikimedia Foundation. The sites is founded on five basic principles, but she never actually lists those 5 principles, but says that neutrality is the most important of them and while the elements that measure the success of the encyclopedia also cause "disenchantment" for those who feel that the focus on neutrality and the bureaucratic structure limits the site. Van Dijck discuses the users of the site and states that crowd management is one of the sites biggest strengths. She points out that it is neither the specialists or the generalists that
Post a Comment
Read more

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 4

Chapter 5 focuses on Twitter. Originally the creators of Twitter were striving to create a utility. A piece of information infrastructure that was an everyday and unnoticeable part of our lives, like electricity or phones. Van Dijck says that this created a paradox in that is "presumes Twitter to be a neutral platform upon which users freely interact, much like the Web itself...indifferent to the contents they exchange" but that "the streams of data are engineered to promote certain uses and users over time" (p.69). Van Dijck says this paradox of "enabling connectedness while engineering connectivity" and "propagating neutrality while securing profitability" show up in every aspect of the platform. This is kind of a trend in all social media platforms as the start out about the user, but need to pay the bills... The Twitter platform has has some pivotal contributions to the culture of connectivity (culture influence tech while tech influences cul
2 comments
Read more