Skip to main content

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Intro and Chapter 1


One of the adventures I've decided to take on during this course is an additional reading of a book titled: The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. The book is written by Jose Van Dijck (2013) with the aim to:

 "offer an analytical model to elucidate how platforms have become central forces in the construction of sociality, how owners and users have helped shape and are shaped by this construction; in other words, it wants to enhance a historical understanding of social media's impact on the everyday lives of families" (p.23).

She begins with an introduction of social media and defines it as a group of online applications, inspired by the ideology and foundations of Web 2.0, that focus on the generation of content by its users. The ideology behind Web 2.0 tech is focused on connectedness and a participatory culture. He identifies several types of social media: social network sites (SNS), user-generated content (UGC), trading and marketing sites (TMSs), and play and game sites (PGS). He says that the boundaries are not always clear and that sometimes they overlap.

Next, she begins by explaining how Web 2.0 started out primarily user motivated, but over the past decade larger corporations acquired the Web 2.0 platforms and shifted the democratic ideology. While on the surface, the corporations still promote these ideologies, they have also hybridized their intentions with the commodification of the user generated data that users, either knowingly or not, share with the company (behavioral and profiling data).

Following these, she moves on to his explanation of the (our?) culture of connectivity. She posits that in this culture, social media acts as communication through which norm are established and evolve. She then outlines several aspects of this culture that will be covered over the course of the book, that the culture is: "inundated by coding technologies whose implications go well beyond the digital architectures of platforms themselves," the "organization of social exchange is staked on neoliberal economic principles," and that "connectivity evolves as part of a longer historical transformation characterized by a resetting of boundaries between private, corporate, and public domains" (p. 20-21)

After reading chapter one, I am excited to continue this journey as I see connections with not only this course, but my big data/web analytics course I am currently taking, as well as other projects I am working on. The chapter does a solid job of establishing the direction and expectations of the book, and at this point I feel will be a useful resource as I continue my education into social media.

Source:

Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.

Comments

  1. I have that book. I'll be curious to hear your thoughts about whether van Dijck's classification system would be useful to invoke on the SSMS project given the unclear boundaries. Or should we not apply it to a specific tool/platform, but rather to a user's intent?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 6

In this chapter, Van Dijck focuses on YouTube. YouTube started with the intentions of being an alternative to broadcast television. Like Flickr, its origins and its present state do not function the same. Where it used to focus on user generated content, the user is considered more of a consumer now with the intention of watching rather than posting. However, YouTube introduced some new abilities that have had a lasting impact. YouTube introduced the idea of streamed content, the ability to upload video, and combined these with aspects of social networking! YouTube videos are rarely downloaded, viewers do not own the content, but they have access to view the material. Where YouTube differs from Flickr is that in its adaptions of the purpose and focus, Some of the original users of the platform were disgruntled by the changes, but the majority of users supported the change and embraced it as a part of their everyday lives, particularly with their capabilities of meshing almost seamlessl

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 7

This chapter focuses on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is much different from the other sites discussed in the book so far, however its inclusion in the top influential actors in the digital landscape is undeniable.  Wikipedia is a "professionally run, volunteer based, nonprofit organization whose goal is the online production of an encyclopedia" (p. 132). It's nonprofit status came about due to the creation and maintenance of the Wikimedia Foundation. The sites is founded on five basic principles, but she never actually lists those 5 principles, but says that neutrality is the most important of them and while the elements that measure the success of the encyclopedia also cause "disenchantment" for those who feel that the focus on neutrality and the bureaucratic structure limits the site. Van Dijck discuses the users of the site and states that crowd management is one of the sites biggest strengths. She points out that it is neither the specialists or the generalists that

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 4

Chapter 5 focuses on Twitter. Originally the creators of Twitter were striving to create a utility. A piece of information infrastructure that was an everyday and unnoticeable part of our lives, like electricity or phones. Van Dijck says that this created a paradox in that is "presumes Twitter to be a neutral platform upon which users freely interact, much like the Web itself...indifferent to the contents they exchange" but that "the streams of data are engineered to promote certain uses and users over time" (p.69). Van Dijck says this paradox of "enabling connectedness while engineering connectivity" and "propagating neutrality while securing profitability" show up in every aspect of the platform. This is kind of a trend in all social media platforms as the start out about the user, but need to pay the bills... The Twitter platform has has some pivotal contributions to the culture of connectivity (culture influence tech while tech influences cul