Skip to main content

Lurker Alert!!!! - Networks, Communities, Freeloaders, and Lurkers

This week focused on the difference between what constitutes a network or a community. After my explorations, I've settled on the following definitions:

Network - A group of people connected through a chain of common interests/themes.

Community - People you know who share a common interest/theme.

Lurker - Someone on social media that acts more as an observer than a participant.

Freeloader - An even more negative reference to a social media lurker.

I think that in the common vernacular there is little differentiation between the use of the term network vs. community, though I think the nuances are important when you are analyzing social media in terms of its utility and effects on the individual and society. A true community is going to provide a much deeper and more valuable space to someone than a network if they are looking to develop their identity or find friendship. A network will be more useful if you are trying to reach far and make connections with those who may help you if you are job searching or looking for information on a shared interest.

I definitely do my fair share of lurking. I window shop and scroll through feeds without sharing or commenting and learn from what is posted. However I am much more active in my communities of friends and co-workers that I am for my networks. When I am active on most social media, I tend to act with the interest of my communities in mind rather that those who are networked in, though now that I've typed that I think I consider acquaintances (people I know, but I am not close with) as networks rather than communities...which goes against the definitions I provided earlier. 

PS. I think that Lurker and Freeloader are really harsh terms to refer to people who are coming into contact with the information that was chosen to be made public.  

Comments

  1. LoriMay 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM

    When the title of your entry came across my RSS feed, I thought, "Oh no! My lurking tendencies have been revealed! :) Seriously though, I was very interested in what you had to say. I agree Lurker and Freeloaders are very negative sounding terms. I also share your thoughts on communities being deeper than networks. Though at any given moment, my interactions may be similar, there is a difference. I feel like I know the people in my community. I know about the people in my networks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stephen BunnJune 8, 2020 at 10:14 AM

      I like that description! Much more succinct than mine! I know my community. I know ABOUT my platform. Thanks for the support and feel free to lurk anytime. Lol!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 6

In this chapter, Van Dijck focuses on YouTube. YouTube started with the intentions of being an alternative to broadcast television. Like Flickr, its origins and its present state do not function the same. Where it used to focus on user generated content, the user is considered more of a consumer now with the intention of watching rather than posting. However, YouTube introduced some new abilities that have had a lasting impact. YouTube introduced the idea of streamed content, the ability to upload video, and combined these with aspects of social networking! YouTube videos are rarely downloaded, viewers do not own the content, but they have access to view the material. Where YouTube differs from Flickr is that in its adaptions of the purpose and focus, Some of the original users of the platform were disgruntled by the changes, but the majority of users supported the change and embraced it as a part of their everyday lives, particularly with their capabilities of meshing almost seamlessl
Post a Comment
Read more

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 7

This chapter focuses on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is much different from the other sites discussed in the book so far, however its inclusion in the top influential actors in the digital landscape is undeniable.  Wikipedia is a "professionally run, volunteer based, nonprofit organization whose goal is the online production of an encyclopedia" (p. 132). It's nonprofit status came about due to the creation and maintenance of the Wikimedia Foundation. The sites is founded on five basic principles, but she never actually lists those 5 principles, but says that neutrality is the most important of them and while the elements that measure the success of the encyclopedia also cause "disenchantment" for those who feel that the focus on neutrality and the bureaucratic structure limits the site. Van Dijck discuses the users of the site and states that crowd management is one of the sites biggest strengths. She points out that it is neither the specialists or the generalists that
Post a Comment
Read more

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 4

Chapter 5 focuses on Twitter. Originally the creators of Twitter were striving to create a utility. A piece of information infrastructure that was an everyday and unnoticeable part of our lives, like electricity or phones. Van Dijck says that this created a paradox in that is "presumes Twitter to be a neutral platform upon which users freely interact, much like the Web itself...indifferent to the contents they exchange" but that "the streams of data are engineered to promote certain uses and users over time" (p.69). Van Dijck says this paradox of "enabling connectedness while engineering connectivity" and "propagating neutrality while securing profitability" show up in every aspect of the platform. This is kind of a trend in all social media platforms as the start out about the user, but need to pay the bills... The Twitter platform has has some pivotal contributions to the culture of connectivity (culture influence tech while tech influences cul
2 comments
Read more