Am I a Digital Native?

This weeks topic focused on the concept of the Digital Native.The idea comes from Pensky who explained that the newest generation should be considered digital natives because they don't have memory from a time when computers, the internet, and social media were pervasive in daily life. The beginning of this group was the year 1984, and while I was born in 1983. I feel that realistically I should probably still be considered a digital native. While I do technically remember not having a computer or the internet in my house, I played video games (and still do), I remember when we got internet pretty early on, and I remember having computer access at school in some of the earliest grades. I find that I'm not afraid of technology and never really have been. When I get a new piece of technology or sign up for a new program or app, I teach myself how to use it through trial and error. When all else fails I use Google. So are the boundaries of what makes a digital native soft? Am I a digital native because of my digital fluency?

After this weeks readings, I feel I ultimately support Prensky's theory over those who were trying to disprove it. I think that the modern day student is different and that their digital fluency has important connotations for the field of education and as such needs to be studied and understood.

I didn't really like the Kirschner piece. They sounded indignant in their writing and seemed to take what Prensky was saying as if the digital native came into the world physically or genetically different, rather than a cultural/social outcome of the everyday presence of technology in their lives. I will note that their views on true multitasking seems logical

Comments

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 6

In this chapter, Van Dijck focuses on YouTube. YouTube started with the intentions of being an alternative to broadcast television. Like Flickr, its origins and its present state do not function the same. Where it used to focus on user generated content, the user is considered more of a consumer now with the intention of watching rather than posting. However, YouTube introduced some new abilities that have had a lasting impact. YouTube introduced the idea of streamed content, the ability to upload video, and combined these with aspects of social networking! YouTube videos are rarely downloaded, viewers do not own the content, but they have access to view the material. Where YouTube differs from Flickr is that in its adaptions of the purpose and focus, Some of the original users of the platform were disgruntled by the changes, but the majority of users supported the change and embraced it as a part of their everyday lives, particularly with their capabilities of meshing almost seamlessl

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 7

This chapter focuses on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is much different from the other sites discussed in the book so far, however its inclusion in the top influential actors in the digital landscape is undeniable. Wikipedia is a "professionally run, volunteer based, nonprofit organization whose goal is the online production of an encyclopedia" (p. 132). It's nonprofit status came about due to the creation and maintenance of the Wikimedia Foundation. The sites is founded on five basic principles, but she never actually lists those 5 principles, but says that neutrality is the most important of them and while the elements that measure the success of the encyclopedia also cause "disenchantment" for those who feel that the focus on neutrality and the bureaucratic structure limits the site. Van Dijck discuses the users of the site and states that crowd management is one of the sites biggest strengths. She points out that it is neither the specialists or the generalists that

The Culture of Connectivity - Jose Van Dijck - Chapter 4

Chapter 5 focuses on Twitter. Originally the creators of Twitter were striving to create a utility. A piece of information infrastructure that was an everyday and unnoticeable part of our lives, like electricity or phones. Van Dijck says that this created a paradox in that is "presumes Twitter to be a neutral platform upon which users freely interact, much like the Web itself...indifferent to the contents they exchange" but that "the streams of data are engineered to promote certain uses and users over time" (p.69). Van Dijck says this paradox of "enabling connectedness while engineering connectivity" and "propagating neutrality while securing profitability" show up in every aspect of the platform. This is kind of a trend in all social media platforms as the start out about the user, but need to pay the bills... The Twitter platform has has some pivotal contributions to the culture of connectivity (culture influence tech while tech influences cul

Bunn - EME6414

Search This Blog